Featured Post

TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Essays - Hypothesis Testing

Target 1 TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Subordinate Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Amen...

Monday, August 24, 2020

TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Essays - Hypothesis Testing

Target 1 TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Subordinate Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Amended Model239892.700a926654.7442.887.023 Intercept424116.3001424116.30045.930.000 blocks137360.867434340.2173.719.020 treatment84800.833184800.8339.184.007 squares * treatment17731.00044432.750.480.750 Error184678.000209233.900 Total848687.00030 Amended Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .565 (Adjusted R Squared = .369) We discover there is no noteworthy contrast among squares and medicines since its huge worth 0.750 is more prominent than 0.05 We discover there is a critical contrast between treatments(urgents) since 0.007 huge worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Thou we were unable to run the post-hoc test since we had 2 medicines. We discover there is a huge contrast between the blocks(concentration) as its critical worth is 0.02 is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05 hence we run the LSD tests to decide the distinction Post Hoc Tests fixation Different COMPARISONS perception LSD (I) concentration(J) concentrationMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1c246.6755.479.410-69.06162.39 c3116.33*55.479.049.61232.06 c4145.50*55.479.01629.77261.23 c5187.83*55.479.00372.11303.56 c2c1-46.6755.479.410-162.3969.06 c369.6755.479.224-46.06185.39 c498.8355.479.090-16.89214.56 c5141.17*55.479.01925.44256.89 c3c1-116.33*55.479.049-232.06-.61 c2-69.6755.479.224-185.3946.06 c429.1755.479.605-86.56144.89 c571.5055.479.212-44.23187.23 c4c1-145.50*55.479.016-261.23-29.77 c2-98.8355.479.090-214.5616.89 c3-29.1755.479.605-144.8986.56 c542.3355.479.454-73.39158.06 c5c1-187.83*55.479.003-303.56-72.11 c2-141.17*55.479.019-256.89-25.44 c3-71.5055.479.212-187.2344.23 c4-42.3355.479.454-158.0673.39 In view of watched implies. The mistake term is Mean Square(Error) = 9233.900. *. The mean distinction is critical at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the critical worth (p-esteem) under 0.05 are essentially extraordinary FINDING C1 is not the same as C3,C4 and C5 C2 is not the same as C5 C3 is not the same as C1 C4 is not the same as C1 C5 IS not the same as C1 and C2 Evaluated Marginal Means earnest Subordinate Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995 2. focus Subordinate Variable:observation concentrationMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1218.16739.230136.335299.999 c2171.50039.23089.668253.332 c3101.83339.23020.001183.665 c472.66739.230-9.165154.499 c530.33339.230-51.499112.165 Target 2 Trial of Between-Subjects Effects Subordinate Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Amended Model232457.500a546491.5005.808.001 Intercept424116.3001424116.30052.983.000 time133719.800266859.9008.353.002 treatment84800.833184800.83310.594.003 time * treatment13936.86726968.433.871.432 Error192113.200248004.717 Total848687.00030 Amended Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .548 (Adjusted R Squared = .453) We discover there is no importance distinction among time and treatment since its hugeness esteem is 0.432 which is more prominent than 0.05. We discover there is a noteworthy contrast between treatments(urgents) since 0.003 critical worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Thou we were unable to run the post-hoc test since we had 2 medicines. We discover there is a noteworthy contrast between time since 0.002 critical worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Along these lines we run the post-hoc test to discover the distinction Post Hoc Tests weeks Numerous Comparisons perception LSD (I) weeks(J) weeksMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 1week 2-114.70*40.012.008-197.28-32.12 week 3-158.30*40.012.001-240.88-75.72 week 2week 1114.70*40.012.00832.12197.28 week 3-43.6040.012.287-126.1838.98 week 3week 1158.30*40.012.00175.72240.88 week 243.6040.012.287-38.98126.18 In light of watched implies. The blunder term is Mean Square(Error) = 8004.717. *. The mean contrast is huge at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the huge worth under 0.05 are fundamentally extraordinary FINDING Week1 is not the same as week2 and week3 Week2 is not the same as week1 Week3 is not the same as week1 Evaluated Marginal Means 1. weeks Subordinate Variable:observation weeksMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 127.90028.293-30.49386.293 week 2142.60028.29384.207200.993 week 3186.20028.293127.807244.593 Additives Subordinate Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.